An Evaluation of the Implementation of the Three Doctors Policy in Primary Care Units in Trat Province
Main Article Content
Abstract
This cross-sectional descriptive research aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of the Three-Doctor (3 หมอ) Policy implementation in primary care units in Trat Province, to identify success factors, barriers, and to propose developmental guidelines. The study employed a quantitative approach using structured questionnaires. The sample consisted of 460 health personnel across three groups, selected using disproportionate stratified sampling to ensure adequate representation: Doctor 1 (Village Health Volunteers; n=372), Doctor 2 (Public Health Officers; n=70), and Doctor 3 (Family Medicine Physicians; n=18), along with 430 service recipients selected through multi-stage sampling calculated using Taro Yamane formula for personnel and Cochran's formula for citizens. Data were collected using two structured questionnaires validated by three experts, with Cronbach's alpha coefficients ranging from 0.87 to 0.93. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, one-way ANOVA with Tukey's HSD post-hoc test, Pearson correlation, and multiple regression analysis.
The results revealed that overall implementation effectiveness was at a high level. All personnel groups demonstrated high levels of policy knowledge (Mean = 3.85–4.03) and operational performance (Mean = 3.76–4.21), with Doctor 3 scoring highest. Operational performance differed significantly among the three groups (F = 3.672, p = 0.026), confirmed by Tukey's HSD showing Doctor 3 significantly higher than Doctor 2 (p = 0.019). Policy knowledge did not differ significantly (F = 1.318, p = 0.268). Knowledge showed a strong positive correlation with performance (r = 0.658, p < 0.01). The factor most influencing citizen satisfaction was the service quality of Doctor 3 (Beta = 0.321), with all predictors explaining 68.7% of satisfaction variance (R² = 0.687; VIF range = 1.32–2.18). Citizens reported high levels of policy awareness (Mean = 3.72) and satisfaction (Mean = 4.07). Primary barriers included excessive workload (38.2–66.7%), resource deficiency—particularly among Doctor 3 (77.8%)—and the lack of an integrated health information system (61.1%).
Recommendations include developing an integrated electronic health information system, reallocating personnel and resources commensurate with workload, and enhancing digital literacy training for elderly Village Health Volunteers.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
This article is published under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which allows others to share the article with proper attribution to the authors and prohibits commercial use or modification. For any other reuse or republication, permission from the journal and the authors is required.References
กรมสนับสนุนบริการสุขภาพ. (2565). นโยบาย 3 หมอ คนไทยทุกครอบครัวมีหมอประจำตัว 3 คน. สืบค้นจาก https://prgroup.hss.moph.go.th/medias/article/1175
กระทรวงสาธารณสุข. (2564). นโยบายคนไทยทุกครอบครัวมีหมอประจำตัว 3 คน. กรุงเทพฯ: กระทรวงสาธารณสุข.
ฑิณกร โนรี, ณรงค์ สหเมธาพัฒน์, และสุภาณี หาญเผชิญ. (2565). การถอดบทเรียนการดำเนินนโยบายคนไทยทุกครอบครัว มีหมอประจำตัว 3 คน ใน 4 จังหวัดของประเทศไทย. นนทบุรี: สถาบันวิจัยระบบสาธารณสุข.
ถวิล เลิกชัยภูมิ. (2567). ประสิทธิผลการดำเนินงานของอาสาสมัครสาธารณสุขประจำหมู่บ้าน หมอคนที่ 1 ในระบบสุขภาพปฐมภูมิ เขตสุขภาพที่ 7. วารสารสาธารณสุขมูลฐาน (ภาคเหนือ), 34(1), 20-27.
พารินทร์ แก้วสวัสดิ์. (2565). แรงจูงใจที่มีความสัมพันธ์กับสมรรถนะการปฏิบัติงานของอาสาสมัครสาธารณสุขประจำหมู่บ้าน อำเภอลาดหลุมแก้ว จังหวัดปทุมธานี. วารสารวิชาการทางการพยาบาลและวิทยาศาสตร์สุขภาพ, 2(2), 1-12.
สำนักงานสาธารณสุขจังหวัดตราด. (2566). รายงานสถานการณ์สุขภาพจังหวัดตราด ประจำปี 2566. ตราด: สำนักงานสาธารณสุขจังหวัดตราด.
Animashaun, E., Hassan, K. A., Karbo, S., Aremu, O., Opare-Henaku, A., Obeng-Nti, F., & Agyepong, I. A. (2025). Thailand's universal health coverage reform as a policy process roadmap for countries pursuing bold health system change. Discover Public Health, 22, 669. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12982-025-01080-w
Chaitiang, N., Satyasomboon, T., & Tunsuchart, K. (2024). Primary health care system development according to Thailand's health policy. Public Health Policy and Laws Journal, 10(3), 655-666. https://doi.org/10.14456/journal_law.2024.52
Cochran, W. G. (1977). Sampling techniques (3rd ed.). John Wiley & Sons.
Donabedian, A. (1988). The quality of care: How can it be assessed? JAMA, 260(12), 1743-1748.
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2019). Multivariate data analysis (8th ed.). Cengage Learning.
Khanthavudh, C., Grealish, A., Tzouvara, V., & Leamy, M. (2025). Supporting healthcare in rural communities in Thailand: An exploratory qualitative study to understand the role and current mental health practices of village health volunteers. PLOS ONE, 20(3), e0320559. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0320559
Kowitt, S. D., Emmerling, D., Fisher, E. B., & Tanasugarn, C. (2015). Community health workers as agents of health promotion: Analyzing Thailand's village health volunteer program. Journal of Community Health, 40(4), 780-788. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10900-015-9999-y
Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30(3), 607-610.
Singweratham, N., Sriratanaban, J., Komwong, D., Maneechay, M., & Siewchaisakul, P. (2025). The lack of impact of primary care units on screening services in Thailand and the transition to local administrative organization policy. Healthcare, 13(5), 1884. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13051884
Sumriddetchkajorn, K., Shimazaki, K., Ono, T., Kusaba, T., Sato, K., & Kobayashi, N. (2019). Universal health coverage and primary care, Thailand. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 97(6), 415-422. https://doi.org/10.2471/BLT.18.223693
Tangcharoensathien, V., Witthayapipopsakul, W., Panichkriangkrai, W., Patcharanarumol, W., & Mills, A. (2018). Health systems development in Thailand: A solid platform for successful implementation of universal health coverage. The Lancet, 391(10126), 1205-1223. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30198-3
Van Meter, D. S., & Van Horn, C. E. (1975). The policy implementation process: A conceptual framework. Administration & Society, 6(4), 445-488.
World Bank. (2021). Thailand public revenue and spending assessment: Promoting an inclusive and sustainable economy. World Bank.
World Health Organization. (2017). Primary health care systems (PRIMASYS): Case study from Thailand, abridged version. WHO Regional Office for South-East Asia. https://iris.who.int/handle/10665/341041
World Health Organization. (2018). Strengthening primary health care for universal health coverage. WHO. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/WHO-HIS-SDS-2018.41
Yamane, T. (1973). Statistics: An introductory analysis (3rd ed.). Harper & Row.