Main Article Content
The objective of this study was to study actual characteristics of student teachers in Physical
Education, Thailand National Sports University Chiang Mai Campus according to mentors and
expectation of executives toward 503 student teachers of the year 2018 in 4 regions including Suphan
Buri Campus and Samut Sakhon in the Central region, Lampang Campus and Chiang Mai Campus in
the North region, Udon Thani Campus and Chaiyaphum Campus in Northeast region and Krabi Campus
and Trang Campus in the South region. The questionnaire and the interview were implemented and
analyzed by using Percentage, Mean and Standard Deviation. The research findings were as following:
- Regarding to actual characteristics of mentors, it was found that
Ethics and Moral area had Mean as 4.70 being in the highest level, Knowledge area had Mean as 4.38
being at high level, Cognitive area had Mean as 4.27 being in high level, Interpersonal Relation skills
and Responsibility area had Mean as 4 .6 4 being in the hightest level, Numerical Analysis,
Communication and Information Technology skills area had Mean as 4.27 being at high level, Learning
Instruction skills area had Mean as 4.49 being at high level, Identity area had Mean as 4.57 being in
the highest level and Teacher Characteristics area had Mean as 4.69 being at the highest level.
2 . According to expectation of executives toward student teachers, it was revealed that
expectation in Ethics and Moral area had Mean as 4.75 being at the highest level, Knowledge area had
Mean as 4.43 being at high level, Cognitive area had Mean as 4.39 being in high level, Interpersonal
Relation skills and Responsibility area had Mean as 4.57 being at the highest level, Numerical Analysis,
Communication and Information Technology skills area had Mean as 4.18 being at high level and
Learning Instruction skills area had Mean as 4.49 being in the highest level.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Any articles and comments This journal is the opinion of the author. The Faculty of Physical Education doesn't always have to agree. Anyone wishing to publish or distribute a message must obtain direct permission from the author.
Suan Dusit University. (2020). Follow-up for graduates with a bachelor's degree for applying
knowledge to graduates' practice. Graduate School: Bangkok.
Pankul, P., & Vacheravarakarn, A. (1999). A Follow-up Study of the Graduates of Rajabhat Institute in
the Rajabhat Rattanakosin Institute Group. Rajabhat Institute.
Peanthong, A. (2013). The Actual Characteristics of Physical Education Institute, Central Region
Campus Students according to Thai Qualifications Framework for Higher Education 2012
(Master's thesis), Srinakharinwirot University.
Office of the Higher Education Commission. (2008). Framework of the Second 15-Year Long Range Plan
on Higher Education A.D. 2008-2022. Bangkok: Office of the Higher Education Commission.
Kanthipwarakul, S. (2016). A Follow-up Project of the Employment Status of Graduates in Physical
Education and Health Education. Faculty of Education, Physical Education Institute, Chiang
Mai Campus. Faculty of Education. Institute of Physical Education, Chiang Mai Campus.
Nuntikul, T. (2011). The undergraduates' TQF levels at Social Sciences Department, Kasetsart
University, Bangkhen. Graduate School: Silpakorn University.
Songsriwittaya, W. (2014). Achievement of Education Management According to the Thai Qualifications
Framework for Higher Education. Master of Industrial Education Program, Computer and
Information Technology Program. Faculty of Industrial Education (Computer and Information
Technology), University Technology Technology King Mongkut Thonburi.