Development clinical decision support system to enhance accuracy in diagnosis and treatment of stroke in emergency patients
Keywords:
Clinical Decision Support System, Stroke, Emergency Department, Machine Learning, Decision TreesAbstract
Objective: To develop and evaluate the effectiveness of a Clinical Decision Support System (CDSS) for diagnosing and treating stroke patients in the emergency department.
Methods: A quasi-experimental one-group pretest-posttest study was conducted. The CDSS was developed using Decision Trees algorithm, trained on retrospective patient data from 2021-2023 (n=300). The dataset was split into 70% training, 20% validation, and 10% testing sets. A pilot study was conducted with 30 patients.
Results: The developed model achieved 92.5% diagnostic accuracy, 91.8% precision, 93.2% recall, and 92.5% F1-score. After implementation, the mean door-to-needle time significantly decreased from 49.46 to 37 minutes (25.19% reduction, p<0.05). Physician satisfaction with the system was 95%, and no incidents of misdiagnosis or medication complications were reported.
Conclusion: The developed CDSS significantly improved the efficiency of stroke diagnosis and treatment in the emergency department by reducing treatment time and enhancing physician confidence in decision-making.
References
J. Warner, R. A. Harrington, R. L. Sacco, and M. S. V. Elkind, “Guidelines for the Early Management of Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke: 2019 Update to the 2018 Guidelines for the Early Management of Acute Ischemic Stroke.,” vol. 50, no. 12, 2019, doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.027708.
E. H. Shortliffe and M. J. Sepúlveda, “Clinical decision support in the era of artificial intelligence,” Jama, vol. 320, no. 21, pp. 2199–2200, 2018.K. Elissa, “Title of paper if known,” unpublished.
J. L. Saver et al., “Stent-retriever thrombectomy after intravenous t-PA vs. t-PA alone in stroke,” NEJM, vol. 372, no. 24, 2015, doi: 10.1056/NEJMOA1415061.Y. Yorozu, M. Hirano, K. Oka, and Y. Tagawa, “Electron spectroscopy studies on magneto-optical media and plastic substrate interface,” IEEE Transl. J. Magn. Japan, vol. 2, pp. 740–741, August 1987 [Digests 9th Annual Conf. Magnetics Japan, p. 301, 1982].
Esteva et al., “Dermatologist-level classification of skin cancer with deep neural networks,” Nature, vol. 542, no. 7639, pp. 115–118, 2017.
G. Litjens et al., “A survey on deep learning in medical image analysis,” Medical image analysis, vol. 42, pp. 60–88, 2017.
E. S. Berner, “Clinical decision support systems,” Springer Science+ Business Media, LLC, 2007.
J. A. Osheroff, J. M. Teich, B. Middleton, E. B. Steen, A. Wright, and D. E. Detmer, “A roadmap for national action on clinical decision support,” Journal of the American medical informatics association, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 141–145, 2007.
Kawamoto, K., Houlihan, C. A., Balas, E. A., & Lobach, D. F. (2005). Improving clinical practice using clinical decision support systems: a systematic review of trials to identify features critical to success. Bmj, 330(7494), 765.
D. Bates et al., “Ten commandments for effectiv e clinical decision support: making the practice of evidence-based medicine a reality,” Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 523–530, 2003.
A. Garg et al., “Effects of computerized clinical decision support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review,” Jama, vol. 293, no. 10, pp. 1223–1238, 2005.
M. Jaspers, M. Smeulers, H. Vermeulen, and L. W. Peute, “Effects of clinical decision-support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes: a synthesis of high-quality systematic review findings,” Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 327–334, 2011.
R. T. Sutton, D. Pincock, D. C. Baumgart, D. C. Sadowski, R. N. Fedorak, and K. I. Kroeker, “An overview of clinical decision support systems: benefits, risks, and strategies for success,” NPJ digital medicine, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 1–10, 2020.
T. Bright et al., “Effect of clinical decision-support systems: a systematic review,” Annals of internal medicine, vol. 157, no. 1, pp. 29–43, 20123
S. Montani and M. Striani, “Artificial intelligence in clinical decision support systems for diagnosis and treatment,” Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare, pp. 219–241, 2019.
B. R. Kummer et al., “Clinical information systems integration in New York City’s first mobile stroke unit,” Applied clinical informatics, vol. 11, no. 01, pp. 130–141, 2020.
V. Abedi et al., “Novel screening tool for stroke using artificial neural network,” Stroke, vol. 48, no. 6, pp. 1678–1681, 2017.
Bernhardt, J., Hayward, K. S., Kwakkel, G., Ward, N. S., Wolf, S. L., Borschmann, K., ... & Cramer, S. C. (2017). Agreed definitions and a shared vision for new standards in stroke recovery research the stroke recovery and rehabilitation roundtable taskforce. International Journal of Stroke, 12(5), 444-450