Retreatment Challenges and Removal Strategies for Hydraulic Calcium Silicate–Based Root Canal Sealers: A Review

Authors

  • Kitichai Singharat Division of Endodontics, College of Dental Medicine, Rangsit University
  • Pakit Tungsawat College of Dental medicine, Rangsit university

Keywords:

bioceramic sealers, hydraulic calcium silicate sealers, laser-assisted photoacoustic streaming, NiTi instruments, retreatment, solvents, supplemental irrigation

Abstract

Hydraulic calcium silicate sealers (HCSs) are increasingly used in endodontics for their bioactivity, alkaline pH, calcium release, dentin bonding, and biocompatibility. While beneficial in primary treatment, these properties complicate nonsurgical retreatment, where effective removal of filling materials is required for disinfection and healing. HCSs become progressively harder and strongly bonded to dentin, and no reliable solvents exist for their dissolution. Nickel–titanium (NiTi) rotary and reciprocating instruments remain the primary tools. Heat-treated rotary files and reciprocating systems, such as Reciproc Blue and WaveOne Gold, improve efficiency but cannot fully eliminate remnants, especially in the apical third. Solvents such as chloroform, formic acid, hydrochloric acid, and citric acid have demonstrated variable efficacy, accompanied by concerns regarding dentin erosion and inconsistent clinical outcomes. Adjunctive methods enhance removal. Passive ultrasonic irrigation, sonic devices, and advanced ultrasonics improve irrigant dynamics. Shape-memory instruments (XP Finisher) and laser-assisted photoacoustic streaming (PIPS, SWEEPS) achieve superior cleaning in complex morphologies but still leave residual material. Complete removal of HCSs remains unachievable, with apical remnants the main limitation. Integration of mechanical, chemical, and supplemental techniques maximizes removal and supports periapical healing.

References

Siqueira JF, Rôças IN. Clinical implications and microbiology of bacterial persistence after treatment procedures. J Endod. 2008;34:1291-1301.e3.

Alves FRF, Rôças IN, Provenzano JC, Siqueira JF. Removal of the previous root canal filling material for retreatment: Implications and techniques. Appl Sci. 2022;12:10217.

Olivieri JG, Feijoo Pato N, Labraca P, Tomàs J, Miró Q, Duran-Sindreu F. Outcome of nonsurgical root canal retreatment procedures obturated with warm gutta-percha techniques: A longitudinal clinical study. J Endod. 2023;49:963–71.

Cardinali F, Camilleri J. A critical review of the material properties guiding the clinician’s choice of root canal sealers. Clin Oral Investig. 2023;27:4147–55.

Wongwatanasanti N, Tungsawat P, Suksaphar W, Lertnantapanya S, Yodmanotham P. Root canal treatment and demand for continuing education among Thai dental practitioners. Open Dent J. 2024;18:e18742106308012.

Kim J hyung, Cho SY, Choi Y, Kim D hyun, Shin SJ, Jung IY. Clinical efficacy of sealer-based obturation using calcium silicate sealers: A randomized clinical trial. J Endod. 2022;48:144–51.

Guivarc’h M, Jeanneau C, Giraud T, Pommel L, About I, Azim AA, et al. An international survey on the use of calcium silicate-based sealers in non-surgical endodontic treatment. Clin Oral Investig. 2020;24:417–24.

Prüllage RK, Urban K, Schäfer E, Dammaschke T. Material properties of a tricalcium silicate–containing, a mineral trioxide aggregate–containing, and an epoxy resin–based root canal sealer. J Endod. 2016;42:1784–8.

Janini ACP, Moraes BF, Pelepenko LE, Dos Santos VAB, Barros-Costa M, Malosá GF, et al. Physicochemical properties and biological interaction of calcium silicate-based sealers - in vivo model. Clin Oral Investig. 2025;29:86.

Singharat K, Wongwatanasanti N, Suksaphar W, Tungsawat P. The effect of irrigation solutions on the setting time, solubility, and pH of three types of premixed bioceramic-based root canal sealers. Int J Dent. 2025;2025:1995662.

Tungsawat P, Tanompetsanga P. Comparison of microleakage between resin-based and bioceramic-based root canal sealers by fluid filtration technique. Mahidol Dent J. 2018;38:279–86.

Tanompetsanga P, Tungsawat P. Microleakage in immediate vs delayed post space preparation in root canals filled with bioceramic-based root canal sealer. World J Dent. 2020;11:172–8.

Jeong JW, DeGraft-Johnson A, Dorn SO, Di Fiore PM. Dentinal tubule penetration of a calcium silicate–based root canal sealer with different obturation methods. J Endod. 2017;43:633–7.

Hess D, Solomon E, Spears R, He J. Retreatability of a bioceramic root canal sealing material. J Endod. 2011;37:1547–9.

Camilleri J. Classification of hydraulic cements used in dentistry. Front Dent Med. 2020;1:9.

AL-Haddad A, Che Ab Aziz ZA. Bioceramic-based root canal sealers: A review. Int J Biomater. 2016;2016:1–10.

Yang DK, Kim S, Park JW, Kim E, Shin SJ. Different Setting Conditions Affect Surface Characteristics and Microhardness of Calcium Silicate-Based Sealers. Scanning. 2018;2018:7136345.

Marashdeh MQ, Friedman S, Lévesque C, Finer Y. Esterases affect the physical properties of materials used to seal the endodontic space. Dent Mater. 2019;35:1065–72.

Patthanawijit L, Yanpiset K, Saikaew P, Jantarat J. Fiber post cemented using different adhesive strategies to root canal dentin obturated with calcium silicate-based sealer. BMC Oral Health. 2024;24:1290.

Suksaphar W, Tungsawat P, Wongwatanasanti N, Lertnantapanya S, Yodmanothum P. Effect of different tapered gutta-percha points on push-out bond strength of two root canal sealers. Eur J Gen Dent. 2025;14:285–90.

Rezaei G, Liu X, Jalali P. Efficacy of different solvents for achieving patency in teeth obturated using bioceramic sealer. J Endod. 2023;49:219–23.

Camilleri J. Sealers and warm gutta-percha obturation techniques. J Endod. 2015;41:72–8.

Copelli FA, Oda LY, Leal RMDS, Rodrigues CT, Duarte MAH, Cavenago BC. Influence of the filling technique on endodontic retreatment in curved mesial canals of mandibular molars: An in vitro study. J Endod. 2025;51:755–60.

Sutharoj T, Dewi A, Phumpatrakom P, Sastraruji T. Comparative evaluation of root canal retreatment techniques and the effect of supplementary cleaning on curved canals obturated with premixed bioceramic sealer. J Endod. 2025;S0099239925003711.

Sujaritwanit K, Panitvisai P. Influence of curved root canal on retreatment efficacy of bioceramic sealer. J Dent Assoc Thai. 2020;70:297304.

Volponi A, Pelegrine RA, Kato AS, Stringheta CP, Lopes RT, Silva ASDS, et al. Micro–computed tomographic assessment of supplementary cleaning techniques for removing bioceramic sealer and gutta-percha in oval canals. J Endod. 2020;46:1901–6.

Zanza A, D’Angelo M, Reda R, Gambarini G, Testarelli L, Di Nardo D. An update on nickel-titanium rotary instruments in endodontics: Mechanical characteristics, testing and future perspective—An overview. Bioengineering. 2021;8:218.

Lee J, Kim HC, Kirkpatrick T, Jaramillo DE, Kwak SW, Jeong JW. Effectiveness of nickel–titanium files for retreatment of molars filled with single-cone hydraulic technique using bioceramic sealers: An in vitro study. Materials. 2025;18:1265.

Farrayeh A, Akil S, Eid A, Macaluso V, Mancino D, Haïkel Y, et al. Effectiveness of two endodontic instruments in calcium silicate-based sealer retreatment. Bioengineering. 2023;10:362.

Ozden I, Durmazpinar PM, Sazak Ovecoglu H. Scanning electron microscopic evaluation of surface defects of remover retreatment file after single and multiple uses. J Vis Exp. 2024;67329.

Lertnantapanya S, Pimkhaokham S. Root canal angulation change when using reciprocating files in different temperatures. J Dent Assoc Thai. 2024;74:131138.

Romeiro K, De Almeida A, Cassimiro M, Gominho L, Dantas E, Chagas N, et al. Reciproc and Reciproc Blue in the removal of bioceramic and resin-based sealers in retreatment procedures. Clin Oral Investig. 2020;24:405–16.

Madarati AA, Sammani AMN, Alnazzawi AA, Alrahlah A. Efficiency of the new reciprocating and rotary systems with or without ultrasonics in removing root-canals filling with calcium silicate-based sealer (MTA). BMC Oral Health. 2023;23:5.

Çiftçioğlu E, Güzel R, Dinçer G, Karakaya G, Küçükay E. Efficiency of Protaper Universal, Reciproc Blue and XP-endo Shaper in the removal of bioceramic-based root canal filling during retreatment. Eur Oral Res. 2023;0:0–0.

Jamleh A, Nassar M, Alfadley A, Alanazi A, Alotiabi H, Alghilan M, et al. Retreatment of oval-shaped root canals filled with TotalFill bioceramic or AH plus sealer. Sci Rep. 2023;13:9357.

Alsulaiman M, Alsofi L, Alhabib MA. Shaping ability of NiTi reciprocating file systems R-motion and waveOne gold in mesial canals of mandibular molars; micro CT study. Sci Rep. 2025;15:747.

Oltra E, Cox TC, LaCourse MR, Johnson JD, Paranjpe A. Retreatability of two endodontic sealers, EndoSequence BC Sealer and AH Plus: A micro-computed tomographic comparison. Restor Dent Endod. 2017;42:19.

Bukhary SM. Retreatability of calcium silicate-based sealers based on micro-computed tomographic evaluation − A systematic review. Saudi Dent J. 2024;36:1278–94.

Al Akam H, Kim HC, Jeong J. Retreatment strategies for cases containing calcium silicate-based root canal sealers: A comprehensive review. Dent J. 2024;12:41.

Garrib M, Camilleri J. Retreatment efficacy of hydraulic calcium silicate sealers used in single cone obturation. J Dent. 2020;98:103370.

Carrillo CA, Kirkpatrick T, Freeman K, Makins SR, Aldabbagh M, Jeong JW. Retrievability of calcium silicate–based root canal sealers during retreatment: An ex vivo study. J Endod. 2022;48:781–6.

Drukteinis S, Bilvinaite G, Sakirzanovas S. The impact of citric acid solution on hydraulic calcium silicate-based sealers and root dentin: A preliminary assessment. Materials. 2024;17:1351.

Fernandes Zancan R, Hadis M, Burgess D, Zhang ZJ, Di Maio A, Tomson P, et al. A matched irrigation and obturation strategy for root canal therapy. Sci Rep. 2021;11:4666.

Van Der Sluis LWM, Versluis M, Wu MK, Wesselink PR. Passive ultrasonic irrigation of the root canal: A review of the literature. Int Endod J. 2007;40:415–26.

Hassan R. Cleaning efficiency of XP Finisher, XP Finisher R and passive ultrasonic irrigation following retreatment of teeth obturated with TotalFill HiFlow bioceramic sealer. Eur Endod J. 2022;7:143–9.

Da Rosa AF, Fischer BV, Dias-Junior LCDL, Serique AVC, Bortoluzzi EA, Teixeira CDS, et al. Effectiveness of different supplementary protocols for remaining filling material removal in endodontic reintervention: An integrative review. Odontology. 2024;112:51–73.

Martins MP, Duarte MAH, Cavenago BC, Kato AS, Da Silveira Bueno CE. Effectiveness of the ProTaper Next and Reciproc systems in removing root canal filling material with sonic or ultrasonic irrigation: A micro–computed tomographic study. J Endod. 2017;43:467–71.

Sinsareekul C, Hiran-us S. Comparison of the efficacy of three different supplementary cleaning protocols in root-filled teeth with a bioceramic sealer after retreatment—a micro-computed tomographic study. Clin Oral Investig. 2022;26:3515–21.

Cıkrık BN, İnce Yusufoğlu S. Efficacy of irrigation activation methods in removal of bioceramic-based sealer in retreatment. Odontology. 2025;113:1119–27.

Hassan E. Cleaning efficacy and debris extrusion using XP-endo finisher and XP-endo Finisher R as supplementary files during retreatment: An in vitro study. Eur Endod J. 2021;7:40–6.

Lyngdoh D, Alam S, Iftekhar H, Mishra SK. Evaluation of canal patency and cleanliness following retreatment of bioceramic sealer-obturated root canals using three different irrigant activation protocols. Aust Endod J. 2024;50:475–85.

Shim E, Son JW, Kwon J, Kim HJ, Jang JH, Chang SW, et al. Retrieval of AH Plus Bioceramic and Ceraseal Versus AH Plus in endodontic retreatment. J Clin Med. 2025;14:1826.

Aksel H, Küçükkaya Eren S, Askerbeyli Örs S, Serper A, Ocak M, Çelik HH. Micro-CT evaluation of the removal of root fillings using the ProTaper Universal retreatment system supplemented by the XP‐Endo Finisher file. Int Endod J. 2019;52:1070–6.

Peters OA, Bardsley S, Fong J, Pandher G, DiVito E. Disinfection of root canals with photon-initiated photoacoustic streaming. J Endod. 2011;37:1008–12.

Yang R, Han Y, Liu Z, Xu Z, Liu H, Wei X. Comparison of the efficacy of laser-activated and ultrasonic-activated techniques for the removal of tricalcium silicate-based sealers and gutta-percha in root canal retreatment: A microtomography and scanning electron microscopy study. BMC Oral Health. 2021;21:275.

Suk M, Bago I, Katić M, Šnjarić D, Munitić MŠ, Anić I. The efficacy of photon-initiated photoacoustic streaming in the removal of calcium silicate-based filling remnants from the root canal after rotary retreatment. Lasers Med Sci. 2017;32:2055–62.

Bago I, Plotino G, Katić M, Ferenac A, Petričević GK, Gabrić D, et al. Effect of a novel laser-initiated photoacoustic activation of a solvent or sodium hypochlorite in the removal of filling remnants after retreatment of curved root canals. Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther. 2021;36:102535.

Angerame D, De Biasi M, Porrelli D, Bevilacqua L, Zanin R, Olivi M, et al. Retreatability of calcium silicate‐based root canal sealer using reciprocating instrumentation with different irrigation activation techniques in single‐rooted canals. Aust Endod J. 2022;48:415–22.

Kapetanović Petričević G, Katić M, Brzović Rajić V, Anić I, Bago I. The efficacy of Er:YAG laser-activated shock wave-enhanced emission photoacoustic streaming compared to ultrasonically activated irrigation and needle irrigation in the removal of bioceramic filling remnants from oval root canals—an ex vivo study. Bioengineering. 2022;9:820.

Sapana S, Arya A, Nandanwar A, Nagar R, Roy P, Tekam D. Comparison of retreatability of AH Plus sealer and bioceramic sealer with solvent, retreatment files and diode laser: A CBCT and SEM analysis. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2024;16:S3528–30.

Hülsmann M, Drebenstedt S, Holscher C. Shaping and filling root canals during root canal re‐treatment. Endod Top. 2008;19:74–124.

Kim K, Kim DV, Kim SY, Yang S. A micro-computed tomographic study of remaining filling materials of two bioceramic sealers and epoxy resin sealer after retreatment. Restor Dent Endod. 2019;44:e18.

Uzunoğlu Özyürek E, Küçükkaya Eren S, Karahan S. Effect of treatment variables on apical extrusion of debris during root canal retreatment: A systematic review and meta-analysis of laboratory studies. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2024;18:1–16.

Tavares KIMC, Pinto JC, Santos-Junior AO, Duarte MAH, Guerreiro-Tanomaru JM, Tanomaru-Filho M. Effect of additional apical preparation on retreatment of curved root canals filled with different sealers. Eur J Dent. 2023;17:636–41.

Bilvinaitė G, Drukteinis S, Šakirzanovas S, Dummer PM. A laboratory study to assess the physico-chemical properties of BioRoot RCS and BioRoot Flow exposed to citric acid and EDTA irrigating solutions. Clin Oral Investig. 2024;28:662.

Ferreira I, Fernandes B, Braga AC, Lopes MA, Pina-Vaz I. Achieving patency in straight canals obturated with AH plus bioceramic sealer: An ex vivo study. Appl Sci. 2025;15:5855.

Agrafioti A, Koursoumis AD, Kontakiotis EG. Re-establishing apical patency after obturation with Gutta-percha and two novel calcium silicate-based sealers. Eur J Dent. 2015;09:457–61.

Eymirli A, Sungur DD, Uyanik O, Purali N, Nagas E, Cehreli ZC. Dentinal tubule penetration and retreatability of a calcium silicate–based sealer tested in bulk or with different main core material. J Endod. 2019;45:1036–40.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-19

How to Cite

Singharat, K. ., & Tungsawat, P. (2025). Retreatment Challenges and Removal Strategies for Hydraulic Calcium Silicate–Based Root Canal Sealers: A Review. Thai Endodontic Journal, 4(2), 79–97. retrieved from https://he03.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/thaiendod/article/view/4776

Issue

Section

Review article