Statistics in Endodontics Part 4: Comparing Means—Basic Statistical Tests in Endodontics
Keywords:
Comparing means, Non-parametric tests, Parametric tests, Research methodology, StatisticsAbstract
Appropriate statistical test selection is essential for valid conclusions in endodontic research and evidence-based clinical practice. This article provides a comprehensive guide to parametric and non-parametric tests for comparing means, emphasizing the critical importance of verifying statistical assumptions before analysis. The review covers fundamental assumptions—continuous dependent variables, independence of observations, normal distribution, homogeneity of variances, and absence of outliers—with practical methods for assessment
using visual inspection and numerical tests. Parametric tests discussed include One-Sample t-test, Independent Samples t-test, Paired Samples t-test, One-Way ANOVA, and One-Way Repeated Measures ANOVA, with detailed guidance on post-hoc testing procedures for
multiple comparisons. When parametric assumptions are violated, non-parametric alternatives are presented with corresponding post-hoc procedures. A decision framework guides test selection based on research design, data characteristics, and assumption verification. Each test includes specific assumptions, hypotheses, and practical examples from endodontic research. Understanding and correctly applying these principles enhances research reliability, reduces statistical errors, and promotes evidence-based clinical decision-making in endodontics.
References
Hazra A, Gogtay N. Biostatistics Series Module 3: Comparing Groups: Numerical Variables. Indian J Dermatol. 2016;61(3):251-60.
Kim TK. T test as a parametric statistic. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2015;68(6):540-6.
Sainani KL. Dealing With Non-normal Data. PM&R. 2012;4(12):1001-5.
Field A. Discovering Statistics Using IBM SPSS Statistics: SAGE Publications; 2018.
Herberich E, Sikorski J, Hothorn T. A Robust Procedure for Comparing Multiple Means under Heteroscedasticity in Unbalanced Designs. PLoS ONE. 2010;5.
Saculinggan M, Balase EA. Empirical Power Comparison Of Goodness of Fit Tests for Normality In The Presence of Outliers. J Phys Conf Ser. 2013;435:012041.
Kim HY. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) comparing means of more than two groups. Restor Dent Endod. 2014;39(1):74-7.
Kim H-Y. Statistical notes for clinical researchers: post-hoc multiple comparisons. Restor Dent Endod. 2015;40(2):172-6.
Schober P, Vetter TR. Nonparametric Statistical Methods in Medical Research. Anesthesia & Analgesia. 2020;131(6):1862-3.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Thai Endodontic Journal

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Thai Endod Journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) license, unless otherwise stated. Please read our Policies in Copyright for more information.


