Policy Review and Analysis of Management Standards in Emergency Medical Practices

Authors

  • Soravit Manopetchkasem Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Thailand
  • Sattha Riyapan Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Thailand
  • Bongkot Somboonkul Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Thailand

Keywords:

emergency medical services, operational standards, information technology, data dictionary

Abstract

Thailand had a continuous upward trend of approximately 1.6 million patients receiving care from emergency medical services (EMS) annually. However, there was limited data on the analysis of prehospital care standards and quality assurance. Literature reviews and consultations with stakeholders in the EMS system serve as fundamental information to establish the operational standards for EMS in Thailand. The objective of this study were to survey and analyze the operational standards for Thai EMS and develop the information technology (IT) system for prehospital data registry in Thailand, and to assess and evaluate the prototyped data dictionary of IT system for the EMS, ensuring alignment with the operational standards for EMS in collaboration with stakeholders in the Thai EMS system. For the methodology, the researchers conducted a narrative literature review on standardized prehospital data registries used in Thailand and abroad, the results were then used to synthesize the prototyped data dictionary of IT system for EMS in Thailand. Once the data dictionary was drafted, the researchers organized focus group meetings with experts in emergency medicine, EMS policymakers, and representatives from the EMS workforce. Aiming to assess the operational standards for EMS in Thailand and gather suggestions on the prototyped data dictionary of IT system for EMS in Thailand. The responses from stakeholders were then analyzed and summarized to provide insights for further development of the IT system for EMS in Thailand. Results: This study revealed that comprehensive data recording to assess performance and determine relevant key performance indicators, with the integration of IT systems into the EMS system, was identified as a potential opportunity to enhance the operational standards for EMS in Thailand. The responses from stakeholders were consistent among three groups, highlighting the importance of thorough and accurate data recording, as well as the adoption of IT systems to support emergency medical operations. The stakeholders suggested that the IT system should be able to continuously develop along with new technologies and evolving emergency medical standards. Additionally, the system should be able to adapt to diverse operational practices and environments across different regions in the country. Most of the stakeholders agreed with the prototyped data dictionary of IT system for EMS in Thailand, with approval rates for all aspects ranging from 78.6% to 100%. For certain aspects with disagreements, the stake holders provided minor suggestions for further adjustments to the data dictionary. However, there were no strong objections to using the proposed data dictionary for the EMS system in Thailand. Conclusion: Comprehensive data recording and using accessible and adaptable IT systems identified as potential operational standards enhancement. The prototyped data dictionary of IT system for EMS in Thailand was accepted by the stakeholders and was considered practical for implementation.

References

สถาบันการแพทย์ฉุกเฉินแห่งชาติ. ข้อมูลพื้นฐานทั่วไป. ดัชนีสมรรถนะระบบการแพทย์ฉุกเฉินระดับจังหวัดปีงบประมาณ พ.ศ. 2566. นนทบุรี: สถาบันการแพทย์ฉุกเฉินแห่งชาติ 2566.

ไพโรจน์ เครือกาญจนา, สันต์ หัตถีรัตน์, ปรีชา ศิริทองถาวร, สมชาย กาญจนสุด, ทิพา ชาคร, ณธิตา สุเมธโชติเมธา, และคณะ. บทที่ 15 ระบบการดูแลรักษาผู้ป่วยฉุกเฉิน (emergency care system). ใน: ชุษณะ มะกรสาร, บรรณาธิการ.Thailand medical services profile 2011-2014 (การแพทย์ไทย 2554-2557). พิมพ์ครั้งที่ 1. นนทบุรี:กรมการแพทย์ กระทรวงสาธารณสุข; 2567. หน้า 1-31.

Tanigawa K, Tanaka K. Emergency medical service systems in Japan: past, present, and future. Resuscitation 2006;69(3):365-70.

Kotsiou OS, Srivastava DS, Kotsios P, Exadaktylos AK, Gourgoulianis KI. The emergency medical system in Greece: opening Acolus' bag of winds. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2018;15(4):745.

Huan TL, Lee AF, Chien YC, Lin CH, Lee BC, Chung YT, et al. Emergency medical services in Taiwan: past, present, and future. J Acute Med 2023;13(3):91-103.

Murphy A, Wakai A, Walsh C, Cummins F, O'Sullivan R. Development of key performance indicators for prehospital emergency care. Emerg Med J 2016; 33(4):286-92.

McCabe A, Nic An Fhaili S, O'Sullivan R, Brenner M, Gannon B, Ryan J, et al. Development and validation of a data dictionary for a feasibility analysis of emergency department key performance indicators. Int J Med Inform 2019;126:59-64.

O'Connor L, Hall M, Smiley A, Richardson J, McCluskey A, Dufton J, et al. Implementation of IntegratedElectronic Health Record Access for Prehospital Clinicians. Am J Emerg Med 2023;74:182-4.

สถาบันการแพทย์ฉุกเฉินแห่งชาติ. แผนกลยุทธ์สถาบันการแพทย์ฉุกเฉินแห่งชาติ 20 ปี (พ.ศ. 2561-2580). นนทบุรี: สถาบันการแพทย์ฉุกเฉินแห่งชาติ; 2562.

National Emergency Medical Services Information System (NEMSIS). NEMSIS v3.5.1 Data dictionary: EMS-DEMSTATE. Salt Lake City, UT: NEMSIS Technical Assistance Center; 2024.

Ong ME, Shin SD, Tanaka H, Ma MH, Khruekarnchana P, Hisamuddin N, et al. Pan-Asian Resuscitation Outcomes Study (PAROS): rationale, methodology, and implementation. Acad Emerg Med 2011;18(8):890-7.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-29

How to Cite

1.
Manopetchkasem S, Riyapan S, Somboonkul B. Policy Review and Analysis of Management Standards in Emergency Medical Practices. Jemst-01JHS [internet]. 2025 Dec. 29 [cited 2026 Jan. 25];5(2):196-207. available from: https://he03.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/Jemst-01JHS/article/view/4244

Issue

Section

Original Article