Ethical Standards of the Publication Ethics Committee

Editor's Duties and Responsibilities

Editors should be responsible for everything published in a journal. in their responsibilities, namely:

proceed according to the wishes of the reader and author
Update the journal regularly.
certify the quality of published research
Support freedom of expression
maintain the accuracy of academic works
Protecting Intellectual Property Standards from Business Needs
Willing to correct publishing errors enlightenment Article removal and removal and apologies if necessary.
Editor's Responsibilities to Readers

The reader should be informed about the research funder and the role of the research funder in conducting that research.
Responsibilities of the Editor to Authors

Editors should do everything possible to ensure the quality of their published articles. to ensure the quality of published research and realized that the journal and each part of the journal They have different objectives and standards.
Editor's decision to accept or reject research articles for publication It should depend on the importance, newness and clarity of the research paper. as well as related to the scope of the journal
There should be clarification or information about the peer review process. Editors should also be prepared to clarify any deviations. from the specified audit process.
Journals should have channels for authors to appeal if authors have different opinions from the editor's decision.
Editors should publish recommendations to authors on all issues that editors anticipate. in all matters the authors should be aware of And the recommendations should always be updated to be up-to-date. It should also include references or links to these regulations.
Editors should not change their decision to accept articles that have been rejected for publication. Unless there was a serious problem during the submission of the article for consideration.
The new editor does not reverse the decision to publish an article rejected by the previous editor. Unless there is proof of serious problems that arise.
Responsibilities of Editors to Article Evaluators

Editors should publish recommendations to reviewers on all issues that editors expect. And the recommendations should always be updated to be up-to-date. It should also include references or links to these regulations.
Editors should have a system that protects the privacy of article reviewers. Unless the journal has an open assessment of articles that have been notified to authors and reviewers in advance.
Article evaluation process

Editors should have systems in place to ensure that articles submitted to journals will be kept confidential during the evaluation process.
complaint

Editors should follow the procedures outlined in the flowchart established by the Publication Ethics Committee.
Editors should respond promptly to complaints. and should demonstrate to the complainant that they can complain again if they are still not satisfied. This mechanism should be clearly shown in the journal. and should include information about how to submit unresolved matters to the Publishing Ethics Committee.
discussion support

Reviews of articles published in journals should be disclosed. Unless the editors have other good reasons for not disclosing the review.
Should allow the author of the article that has been criticized by other people to be able to clarify the response. In addition, research studies that have conflicting results with published research papers. should also be given this opportunity.
Research studies that report negative findings should also be included in the article. This section should not be omitted.
support academic validity

Editors should ensure that every detail in a peer-reviewed research article is published in a journal. Must comply with internationally recognized ethical principles.
Editors should seek evidence to ensure that all research to be published is approved and approved by a competent body (e.g. Research Ethics Committee). However, editors should keep in mind that approval does not always guarantee that research is ethical.
Protection of personal information

Editors should protect the confidentiality of personal information (such as the patient-doctor relationship, for example). Editors are therefore required to obtain written consent from the patient if the patient's name or photo appears in a report or article. However, editors can publish articles without consent if they are important to the health of the general public. (or important in some respects) or having difficulty obtaining consent documents and that person does not object to the publication (The above three conditions must be met.)
tracing misconduct

Editors are responsible for monitoring any suspected misconduct. This includes both published and unpublished research articles.
Editors should not immediately reject research articles that may be subject to abuse. Editors are responsible for following up on research articles allegedly misconduct to find out the facts.
Editors should first seek answers from the accused person. But if you are still not satisfied with the answer received, ask your supervisor or the relevant team. (Sometimes it may be a regulatory body) to check the facts.
Editors should act as required by the Publication Ethics Committee flowchart when needed.
Editors should endeavor to ensure that due diligence is carried out on a causal basis. But without doing so, editors should work hard to find a solution to the problem, which, although difficult.