The Outcomes of the Critical Value Reporting Approach for Platelet Count in Patients with Dengue Fever at Lam Thap Hospital, Krabi Province

Main Article Content

Juthima Phandang, B.Sc.

Abstract

This study is an action research that involves planning, implementation, observation, and reflection. This is a descriptive research design that utilizes retrospective data collection. The objective was to examine the outcomes of implementing a medical laboratory critical value reporting protocol for platelet count in patients with dengue fever at Lam Thap Hospital, Krabi Province. The sample consisted of data from dengue patients who received treatment at Lam Thap Hospital and had critical platelet values reported between October 1, 2023, and September 30, 2024. The sample size of 95 cases was determined using Krejcie and Morgan’s formula and selected through simple random sampling (lottery method). Research instruments included data recording forms for treatment outcomes and the laboratory's critical platelet value report log. The content validity index (CVI) of the instruments was 0.95, 1.00, 0.95, and 1.00, respectively.


           The results after implementing the protocol revealed the following quality indicators:
(1) 83 cases (87.4%) had critical platelet values reported accurately and within 15 minutes.
(2) 42 cases (44.2%) received clinical responses to the critical low platelet counts within 21–30 minutes. (3) 89 cases (93.7%) continued receiving treatment at Lam Thap Hospital, while 6 cases (6.3%) were referred to Krabi Hospital. Among those referred, 2 cases (2.1%) were transferred within 30 minutes after receiving the critical value report.

Article Details

How to Cite
Phandang, B.Sc., J. (2025). The Outcomes of the Critical Value Reporting Approach for Platelet Count in Patients with Dengue Fever at Lam Thap Hospital, Krabi Province . Sisaket Journal of Research and Health development, 4(2), p. 35–45. retrieved from https://he03.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/SJRH/article/view/4188
Section
บทความวิจัย

References

คณะกรรมการทีมนำทางคลินิก รพ.ลำทับ จ.กระบี่.(2567). แนวทางการรักษาผู้ป่วยโรคไข้เลือดออก. ม.ม.พ. สำนักโรคติดต่อนำโดยแมลง กรมควบคุมโรค.กระทรวงสาธารณสุข. (2567, 16 ธันวาคม). การ พยากรณ์โรค ไข้เลือดออก พ.ศ. 2564. www.ato.moph.go.t/Dengue_forecasting%

สำนักระบาดวิทยา กรมควบคุมโรค.กระทรวงสาธารณสุข. (2565). การเฝ้าระวังโรคติดต่อ. http://www.boe.moph.go.th/repor p

องอาจ เจริญสุข. (2560). ระบาดวิทยาประยุกต์เพื่อการป้องกันและควบคุมโรคไข้เลือดออก. บริษัท บอร์น ทู บี พับลิชชิ่ง จำกัด.

Anand S.Dighe, Arjun Rao, Amanda B. Coakley, and Lewandrowski. (2006). Analysis of Laboratory Critical Value Reporting at a Large Academic Medical Centrer. Am. J Clin Pathol, 125 : 758 – 764.

Kemmis, S & McTagart, R. (1988). The Action Research Planer. (3rd ed.). Victoria: Deakin University.

Koul,Lokesh. (1984). Methodology of Educational Research. New Delhi: Vani Education Book, 1984

Krejcie, R. V. & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining Sample Size for Research Activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30(3): 607-610.

Likert, R. (1932). A technique for the measurement of attitude. Archives of Psychology, 22(140), 1-55.

Safe Patient Outcomes Occur with Timely, (2009). Standardzed Communication of Critical Values. Pa Patient Saf Advis, 6(3):93-7