A Comparison Success of Video Laryngoscope and Gum Elastic Bougie with Macintosh Laryngoscope for Simulated C-Spine Immobilization Tracheal Intubation by Experienced in Emergency Room Kantharalak Hospital

Main Article Content

๋Jenta Autsaha, M.D.

Abstract

             Intubation of trauma patients can be difficult the neck is usually immobilized to prevent further injury. To improve the intubation success rate, video laryngoscopes and gum elastic bougies require different techniques for intubation. This study aims to compare the speed and first-pass success rate of endotracheal intubation between video laryngoscopes and gum elastic bougies with Macintosh laryngoscopes in a C-spine immobilization. A manikin-based experimental study by 30 experienced in the emergency room at Kantharalak Hospital was conducted from July to August 2024 (physician, emergency nurse practitioner, nurse anesthetist, paramedic). Participants were randomly divided into two groups; Group 1 intubation with a video laryngoscope and Group 2 intubation with a gum elastic bougie with a Macintosh laryngoscope before switching to the other, time to intubation and the first-pass success rate were recorded and analyzed, collected data using a data recording research tool and experiment, data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and inferential statistics.             


             The results showed that the time to intubation in a C-spine immobilization manikin was 30.74±23.67 seconds and 24.76±6.16 seconds in the video laryngoscope and gum elastic bougie with Macintosh laryngoscope, respectively, which had no statistical significance difference between group (p-value = 0.157). There was no statistically significant difference in the first-pass success rates between these groups, with 100% and 93.33%, respectively (p-value = 0.500).                         


             Conclusions: the use of Video Laryngoscope and Gum Elastic Bougie with Macintosh Laryngoscope are similarly effective for C-spine immobilization tracheal intubation.

Article Details

How to Cite
Autsaha, M.D. ๋. (2024). A Comparison Success of Video Laryngoscope and Gum Elastic Bougie with Macintosh Laryngoscope for Simulated C-Spine Immobilization Tracheal Intubation by Experienced in Emergency Room Kantharalak Hospital. Sisaket Journal of Research and Health development, 3(4), p. 100–112. retrieved from https://he03.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/SJRH/article/view/3343
Section
บทความวิจัย

References

ช่วยหายใจในครั้งแรก และใช้เวลาได้อย่างรวดเร็วเอกสารอ้างอิงพรรณวิไล ตั้งกุลพานิชย์. (2560). การฝึกปฏิบัติเวชหัตถการกู้ชีพขั้นสูง. วิทยาลัยแพทย์ฉุกเฉินแห่งประเทศไทย.

Driver BE, Prekker ME, Reardon RF, Fantegrossi A, Walls RM, Brown CA 3rd. (2020). Comparing

Emergency Department First-Attempt Intubation Success With Standard-Geometry and Hyperangulated Video Laryngoscopes. Ann Emerg Med, 76(3), 332-338. https:// doi:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2020.03.011.

Messa MJ, Kupas DF, Dunham DL. (2011). Comparison of bougie-assisted intubation with traditional

endotracheal intubation in a simulated difficult airway. Prehosp Emerg Care, 15(1), 30-33. https://

doi:10.3109/10903127.2010.519821.

American College of Surgeons. (2018). Initial assessment and management. Advanced Trauma Life

Support Student Course Manual. 10th ed. 2-21. Chicago: American College of Surgeons.

Kaplan MB, Hagberg CA, Ward DS, Brambrink A, Chhibber AK, Heidegger T, Lozada L, Ovassapian A,

Parsons D, Ramsay J, Wilhelm W, Zwissler B, Gerig HJ, Hofstetter C, Karan S, Kreisler N,

Pousman RM, Thierbach A, Wrobel M, Berci G. (2006). Comparison of direct and video-assisted

views of the larynx during routine intubation. J Clin Anesth, 18(5), 357-362. https://doi:

1016/j.jclinane.2006.01.002.

Kim HJ, Chung SP, Park IC, Cho J, Lee HS, Park YS. (2008). Comparison of the GlideScope video

laryngoscope and Macintosh laryngoscope in simulated tracheal intubation scenarios. Emerg

Med J, 25(5), 279-282.

Komatsu R, Kamata K, Hoshi I, Sessler DI, Ozaki M. (2008). Airway scope and gum elastic bougie with

Macintosh laryngoscope for tracheal intubation in patients with simulated restricted neck mobility.

Br J Anaesth, 101(6), 863-869.

Lim TJ, Lim Y, Liu EH. (2005). Evaluation of ease of intubation with the GlideScope or Macintosh

laryngoscope by anaesthetists in simulated easy and difficult laryngoscopy. Anaesthesia, 60(2),

-183. https://doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2004.04038.x.

Messa MJ, Kupas DF, Dunham DL. (2011). Comparison of bougie-assisted intubation with traditional

endotracheal intubation in a simulated difficult airway. Prehosp Emerg Care, 15(1), 30-33.

https://doi: 10.3109/10903127.2010.519821.

Reza Yazdani, Mehrdad Vosough Rouhani, Seyed Ashkan Tabibzadeh Dezfuli. (2019). Comparison of

the Speed and Success of Endotracheal Intubation between BOUGIE and Flexible Video

Laryngoscope on the CPR on Manikin by Emergency Residents, J Res Med Dent Sci, 7(3),

-177.

Wang HE, Carlson JN. Tracheal intubation. In: Tintinalli JE, Ma OJ, Yealy DM, Meckler GD, ///////Stapczynski JS, Cline DM, Thomas SH editors. (2020). Tintinalli’s Emergency Medicine: A ///////Comprehensive Study Guide. 9th ed. 179-190. China (Mainland): McGrawHill.