Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy experience in Vachira Phuket Hospital
Keywords:
Prostate cancer,, Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy,, Minimally invasive surgeryAbstract
Background: The experience of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy guarantees accuracy, reduces complications, and enhances patient results. It also improves the effectiveness of treatment and speeds up recovery. For a few seconds, Patient outcomes are enhanced by accurate surgery and fewer problems, which are guaranteed by experience with laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. It also increases the efficacy of cancer treatment and encourages a quicker recovery.
Objective: To describe our experience in transperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP) and provide functional and oncological outcomes for the first 10 cases at our institution.
Materials and methods: A retrospective review from October 2020 to September 2021 identified 10 patients who underwent LRP for localized/locally advanced prostate cancer. The patient and tumor characteristics, pre-and postoperative prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels, Gleason score, operative time, estimated blood loss, perioperative complications, and postoperative outcomes were recorded and analyzed.
Results: The median age of the patients was 64.7 years and the median preoperative PSA was 38.89 ng/mL. Five (50%) patients had PSA levels between 10 and 20 ng/mL and four (40%) patients had PSA levels >20 ng/mL. Four patients (40%) had Gleason scores <7 at the time of initial diagnosis. The median operative time was 254 minutes and the median estimated blood loss was 280 mL. Clavien-Dindo grade 3–5 complications were not observed. The median hospital stay and catheter time were 9 and 23 days, respectively. All patients achieved undetectable postoperative PSA after LRP at 12 weeks. Nine patients recovered continence completely at 3 months postoperatively.
Conclusion: LRP is the standard treatment for patients with non-metastatic prostate cancer. LRP is safe and feasible for the beginner urologist. The oncological and functional outcomes were similar to high-volume centers.
References
Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA: a cancer journal for clinicians. 2021. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21660.
Lojanapiwat B. Urologic cancer in Thailand. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2015 Nov;45(11):1007-15. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyv125. Epub 2015 Sep 9. PMID: 26355159.
Knipper S, Ott S, Schlemmer HP, Grimm MO, Graefen M, Wiegel T. Options for Curative Treatment of Localized Prostate Cancer [published online ahead of print, 2021 Apr 2]. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2021;118(Forthcoming):228-236. doi:10.3238/arztebl.m2021.0026
Schuessler WW, Schulam PG, Clayman RV, Kavoussi LR. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: initial short-term experience. Urology. 1997 Dec;50(6):854-7. doi: 10.1016/S0090-4295(97)00543-8. PMID: 9426713.
Guillonneau B, Cathelineau X, Doublet JD, Baumert H, Vallancien G. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: assessment after 550 procedures. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2002 Aug;43(2):123-33. doi: 10.1016/s1040-8428(02)00024-0. PMID: 12191734.
Karnjanawanichkul W, Tanthanuch M, Pripatnanont C. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in Songklanagarind Hospital: first series from Southern Thailand. J Med Assoc Thai. 2013 Nov;96(11):1444-8. PMID: 24428094.
Ferronha F, Barros F, Santos VV, Ravery V, Delmas V. Is there any evidence of superiority between retropubic, laparoscopic, or robot-assisted radical prostatectomy? Int Braz J Urol. 2011 Mar-Apr;37(2):146-58; discussion 159-60. Doi: 10.1590/s1677-55382011000200002. PMID: 21557832.
Guillonneau B, el-Fettouh H, Baumert H, Cathelineau X, Doublet JD, Fromont G, Vallancien G. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: oncological evaluation after 1,000 cases a Montsouris Institute. J Urol. 2003 Apr;169(4):1261-6. Doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000055141.36916.be. PMID: 12629339.
Guillonneau B, Vallancien G. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: initial experience and preliminary assessment after 65 operations. Prostate. 1999; 39: 71-5.
Abbou CC, Salomon L, Hoznek A, Antiphon P, Cicco A, Saint F, et al. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: preliminary results. Urology 2000; 55: 630-4.
Turk I, Deger S, Winkelmann B, Schonberger B, Loening SA. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Technical aspects and experience with 125 cases. Eur Urol 2001; 40: 46-52; discussion 3.
Bollens R, Vanden Bossche M, Roumeguere T, Damoun A, Ekane S, Hoffmann P, et al. Extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Results after 50 cases. Eur Urol 2001; 40: 65-9.
Nualyong C, Srinualnad S, Taweemonkongsap T, Amornvesukit T. Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy: Preliminary Result of Thailand Series. J Med Assoc Thai 2006;89:1440-6.
Thaidumrong T, Akarasakul D, Doungkae S. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy technical aspects and experience with 100 cases in Rajavithi Hospital. J Med Assoc Thai. 2011 Mar;94 Suppl 2:S29-34. PMID: 21717875.
Sirithanaphol W, Rompsaithong U, Kiatsopit P, Lumbiganon S, Pachirat K. Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy: Initial Experience in Srinagarind Hospital. SRIMEDJ [Internet]. 2019 Sep. 19
Hu JC, Gu X, Lipsitz SR, et al. Comparative Effectiveness of Minimally Invasive vs Open Radical Prostatectomy. JAMA 2009;302(14):1557–1564. doi:10.1001/jama.2009.1451
Francesco De Carlo, Francesco Celestino, Cristian Verri, Francesco Masedu, Emanuele Liberati, Savino Mauro Di Stasi; Retropubic, Laparoscopic, and Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Surgical, Oncological, and Functional Outcomes: A Systematic Review. Urol Int 1 December 2014; 93 (4): 373–383. https://doi.org/10.1159/000366008
Ferrer-Márquez M, Belda-Lozano R. Barbed sutures in general and digestive surgery. Review. Cir Esp. 2016 Feb;94(2):65-9. English, Spanish. doi: 10.1016/j.ciresp.2015.03.007. Epub 2015 Apr 15. PMID: 25890443.
Ficarra V, Novara G, Rosen RC, Artibani W, Carroll PR, Costello A, Menon M, Montorsi F, Patel VR, Stolzenburg JU, Van der Poel H, Wilson TG, Zattoni F, Mottrie A. Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting urinary continence recovery after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol. 2012 Sep;62(3):405-17. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.05.045. Epub 2012 Jun 1. PMID: 22749852.
Pacik D, Fedorko M. Literature review of factors affecting continence after radical prostatectomy. Saudi Med J. 2017 Jan;38(1):9-17. doi: 10.15537/smj.2017.1.15293. PMID: 28042624; PMCID: PMC5278072.
Chalieopanyarwong V, Attawettayanon W, Kanchanawanichkul W, Pripatnanont C, Radical Prostatectomy in High-Risk Prostate Cancer Patients: Results of a Single- Institution Study. Songkla Med J. 2018;36(1):45-51.
Chalieopanyarwong V, Attawettayanon W, Kanchanawanichkul W, Pripatnanont C. The Prognostic Factors of Biochemical Recurrence-Free Survival Following Radical Prostatectomy. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2017 Sep 27;18(9):2555-2559. doi: 10.22034/APJCP.2017.18.9.2555. PMID: 28952300; PMCID: PMC5720666.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.


